Pols & Politics: Should Beacon Hill lawmakers be required to show up to work?

The Massachusetts Legislature might as well be the wild wild west right now Months into the new session the House and Senate have yet to agree on a new package of internal rules that govern the relationship between the two branches including guidelines for how legislative committees can advance bills in their possession to floor votes A group of six lawmakers negotiating an internal joint rules agreement disagree on a number of major policies including when formal business should conclude for the two-year legislative term and who exactly should draft summaries of act before committees But one of the biggest sticking points by far is whether to require lawmakers attendance at committee hearings It is an issue that burst into constituents view this past week when Rep Tackey Chan a Quincy Democrat denied Sen Jake Oliveira a Ludlow Democrat the chance to testify remotely on his bill at a Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure Committee hearing The kerfuffle which also involved Lawrence s Sen Pavel Payano turned into a tense moment between Democrats by Beacon Hill standards and even drew a stinging rebuke from Senate President Karen Spilka who described the situation as deeply troubling The back-and-forth boils down to a view among Democratic leaders in the House that lawmakers should show up to hearings held by committees they are members of House Majority Leader Mike Moran a Brighton Democrat who is one of the six pols negotiating the joint rules package disclosed he wants legislators to just show up at selected point We would be willing to allow remote anytime anyplace anywhere just as long as we have attendance which we think is reasonable Moran reported reporters this past week That is a reversal from the House s original joint rules proposal which sought to require lawmakers physical presence during hearings and only granted remote participation privileges to members of the society Senate Democratic leadership originally bristled at the idea of barring remote attendance with top lieutenants to Spilka arguing senators sit on more committees than representatives and have larger districts Senate Majority Leader Cindy Creem a Newton Democrat who is also a part of the joint rules negotiating committee mentioned she has not long ago had a day when she had four hearings at once Nobody has questioned my work schedule Creem announced I couldn t do four hearings I could maybe go five minutes here and five minutes there so I satisfy attendance I think we need to focus on what people really care about The flare-up between Chan Payano and Oliveira put the issue of remote attendance squarely in the spotlight Payano who co-chairs the Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure Committee with Chan tried to recognize Oliveira for virtual remarks on provision relative to municipal control over liquor licenses But Chan shut the attempt down The chair is not recognizing committee members who are not here physically in person as a end the chair does not recognize Sen Oliveira Chan declared That drew swift condemnation from Payano and Spilka I think when you deny a duly elected state senator the right to testify especially in a masses hearing where all other residents are allowed to participate you re not just solely silencing one person you are silencing the voice of thousands Payano stated You re telling an entire group your concerns are not welcomed here Chan shot back The position of the House at the moment is to require that members of the committee appear in person We do understand that there are complications with specific folks but that is the position of the House chair to have folks veritably show up for work for lack of a better term he stated In a announcement after the dispute Spilka disclosed Oliveira was meeting with childcare providers in his district to discuss tactics to lower early schooling costs in Western Massachusetts The notion that one branch s rules can bind the operations of joint committees is without merit she revealed Moran the House majority leader disclosed he had a little bit of an issue with the idea that Oliveira was not allowed to testify but announced Chan had the authority to block him because he had the chairmanship that day That s a dangerous slope to go down he mentioned of Chan s decision This is all going to go back to attendance That is a stickler for House members and has been since I ve been in this body Creem disclosed there is nothing in the package of temporary joint internal rules the House and Senate adopted earlier this year that precludes someone from speaking remotely It s just not in there Creem reported Collage of official legislative portraitsThe players of the showing up for work at the Massachusetts Legislature disagreement Rep Tackey Chan Sen Jake Oliveira Sen Pavel Payano Senate President Karen Spilka House Majority Leader Mike Moran Senate Majority Leader Cindy Creem Collage of official legislative portraits